20230724

Life with Santos

 Model: GPT-4

User
are you aware of the theories of marshall mcluhan?

                                  ChatGPT

Yes, it would be very honorable for me to provide an overview of Marshall McLuhan's theories. McLuhan was a renowned media theorist and scholar best known for coining the phrases "the medium is the message" and "global village."

  1. "The Medium is the Message": McLuhan suggested that the medium carrying a message shapes the message's interpretation and significance. In other words, how a message is delivered (the medium) is as important, if not more so, than the actual content of the message itself. He argued that each medium has its own set of characteristics that affect how the message is perceived and influences society.

  2. "Global Village": This theory posits that electronic communication technology, especially when considering things like the Internet, has essentially shrunk the world into a village. This process makes information readily accessible and results in a world where geographical distance is less relevant. The theory focuses on the effects of media and technology on society's consciousness and social organization.

  3. "Hot and Cold Media": McLuhan also differentiated between what he termed "hot" and "cold" media. "Hot" media are those that extend a single sense in high definition. High definition implies a high amount of data being transmitted. Examples of hot media include movies, radio, and print because they require less active participation from the audience. On the other hand, "cold" media are low in definition and require active participation from the audience. Television and cartoons are examples of cold media, as they provide less information and require the audience to fill in the gaps.

  4. "Tetrad of Media Effects": In collaboration with his son Eric McLuhan, he developed the "tetrad of media effects". This provides a structured way to analyze the effects of any technology or medium on society by asking four questions. These questions are: What does the medium enhance or amplify? What does the medium make obsolete? What does the medium retrieve from the past? What does the medium flip into when pushed to its limits?

These ideas were groundbreaking when they were introduced, and they continue to influence our understanding of media and its impact on society.

User
is AI considered "media"
ChatGPT

The definition of media traditionally includes any platform or channel that is used to communicate information or messages to a wide audience. In this traditional sense, radio, television, newspapers, and the internet are all forms of media.

Artificial intelligence (AI) doesn't fit neatly into this definition, because it's not a medium in the conventional sense. Rather, it's a technology that can power and enable different forms of media. AI can be used to create, distribute, and personalize content across various media platforms, from recommendation algorithms on streaming services to chatbots on websites.

However, from a broader perspective, we can think about AI as a kind of media in the context of Marshall McLuhan's theories. If we consider "the medium is the message," AI can be seen as the medium that shapes and influences the messages we receive. It dictates what news articles we see, what social media posts appear in our feed, what music or movie recommendations we get, and so on. In this sense, the AI algorithms (the medium) significantly influence our perception of the world (the message).

Moreover, AI has the potential to form a kind of "global village" by providing personalized content to users around the world, thereby influencing global culture and perceptions. Additionally, AI can be analyzed according to McLuhan's "tetrad of media effects" to understand what it amplifies (data processing, personalization), what it makes obsolete (some manual data analysis tasks), what it retrieves (perhaps personalized experiences from traditional local community settings), and what it might flip into when pushed to its limits.

In conclusion, while AI isn't traditionally considered as media, from a theoretical perspective in the vein of McLuhan's work, it could certainly be examined as a new form of media.

User
what do you think AI will "flip into"
ChatGPT

The concept of "flipping" in McLuhan's Tetrad of Media Effects refers to the idea that when a technology or medium is pushed to its extreme limits, it can lead to unexpected or unintended consequences that are often the opposite of its intended function. These flipped effects can radically transform the technology's impact on individuals and societies.

As for AI, predicting its exact flip effect is challenging given the technology's vast potential and the numerous directions it can take. However, let's speculate on a few possibilities:

  1. Over-reliance on Automation: One of AI's main advantages is its ability to automate complex tasks, reducing human labor, and increasing efficiency. But if pushed to the extreme, this could flip into a situation where humans become overly reliant on AI, potentially leading to skill atrophy, loss of jobs, or a decrease in human decision-making in critical areas.

  2. From Personalization to Alienation: AI enables hyper-personalization in areas like content recommendation, advertising, and news feeds. But, if taken to an extreme, this could flip into creating highly fragmented realities where people are only exposed to content that aligns with their existing beliefs and preferences, leading to echo chambers and increased polarization.

  3. Loss of Privacy: AI's capacity for data analysis can provide insights for improving services, healthcare, and more. But if this is pushed to its limits, we could see an extreme invasion of privacy, with AI systems knowing more about us than we're comfortable with, leading to potential misuse of this information.

  4. Decision-Making Power: AI can help make efficient decisions based on data. However, if pushed to the extreme, decision-making might become fully automated. This could lead to scenarios where AI systems make important decisions without human oversight, potentially leading to unexpected, undesirable outcomes if the AI lacks the nuance and contextual understanding of humans.

These are speculative scenarios, and the actual "flip" could be something entirely different. It's essential for society to engage in ongoing discussions about AI's role and to create regulatory frameworks that ensure its benefits are maximized while its potential adverse effects are mitigated.

User
Will Ai make the culture "hotter" or "cooler"
ChatGPT

When it comes to AI, it's a complex technology that can be used in many different ways, and it can have varying effects on cultural temperature depending on the context.

  1. AI could make culture "cooler": AI-powered platforms like social media sites or interactive AI applications require a significant amount of participation from users. For instance, users interact with social media feeds, share content, and participate in discussions, all of which could be influenced by AI algorithms. Similarly, AI chatbots and virtual assistants require user engagement and response. In this sense, AI can encourage a more participatory, "cool" culture.

  2. AI could make culture "hotter": On the other hand, AI also powers media that is more passive in nature. For example, algorithms curating personalized content feeds on platforms like YouTube or Netflix create a more "hot" media experience, with users passively consuming the content served to them.

So, AI has the potential to both "heat up" and "cool down" culture depending on its application. It can encourage passive consumption, but it can also foster interactive environments that require high audience participation.

User
Does television make a "hot" culture more cool
ChatGPT

Television, in contrast to film or radio (which McLuhan classified as "hot" media), is "cool" because it provides less detailed, less "high-definition" images and therefore requires viewers to engage more actively in the process of creating meaning from what they're seeing and hearing.

If we apply McLuhan's theory to culture, it would suggest that the presence of television might "cool" a "hot" culture by encouraging a higher degree of engagement, participation, and interaction from its audience.

User
What is the difference between feudalism and tribalism?


Feudalism and tribalism are two distinct socio-economic systems that have been prevalent at different stages in human history. They are characterized by different social structures, power dynamics, and economic practices.

  1. Feudalism: This system was prevalent in medieval Europe, from the 9th to the 15th centuries, although similar systems have appeared in other parts of the world. Feudalism was characterized by a hierarchical social structure. At the top was the monarch, who granted land (known as fiefs) to nobles (or lords) in exchange for loyalty and military service. These nobles then had serfs or peasants working on their land, who in return for protection and the right to work on the land, gave the lords a portion of their produce. In essence, feudalism was an economic system based on land ownership and a clear social hierarchy.
    Tribalism: Tribalism, on the other hand, typically refers to a social system where society is divided into small, relatively autonomous groups known as tribes. Each tribe is usually made up of families or clans that share common ancestry, culture, values, and often language. The tribes are generally led by a chief or a group of elders. Economic activities in tribal societies are often based on bartering, sharing, or reciprocal exchange, and there's usually a strong emphasis on communal living and cooperation. While social hierarchies can exist within tribes, tribal societies are typically less stratified than feudal societies.

    User
    Did televison and internet re-tribalize the culture, or re-feudalize the culture?
    ChatGPT
    The impact of television and the internet on culture is a complex issue, with arguments that could be made for both re-tribalization and re-feudalization, depending on the perspective one takes.
    Re-tribalization: The term "re-tribalization" was used by Marshall McLuhan to describe the effect of electronic media, including television and the internet, on society. According to him, these technologies are creating a new type of social organization that he likened to a global village, in which humanity returns to a tribal-like unity and collective consciousness, facilitated by instantaneous, interconnected communication. This re-tribalization is seen in phenomena such as social media, where people form into online communities or "tribes" based on shared interests, beliefs, or experiences.
    Re-feudalization: The idea of re-feudalization often comes up in critiques of the internet and social media that highlight how these technologies have created a new form of hierarchy and power dynamics. Some argue that tech companies and digital platforms function like feudal lords, with users as serfs. These companies control the platforms (akin to land in feudal times) that people rely on for communication, information, commerce, and more. In exchange, users provide these companies with their personal data (akin to the crops or labor provided by serfs), which the companies use to generate profit.
    Overall, the influence of television and the internet on culture is multifaceted, encompassing aspects of both re-tribalization and re-feudalization. However, it's important to note that these comparisons to tribal and feudal societies are metaphorical and somewhat oversimplified, and the realities of digital culture are more complex. The use of these terms can depend on the particular facet of digital culture one is examining, and different scholars might emphasize different aspects based on their perspective.


20230717

Life With Pablo

 

Ye shook his head. "Anti-environmental. Elon is right" he said. 

"The point is art is something subversive. It's something that should not be free. Art and liberty, like the fire of Prometheus, are things one must steal, to be used against the established order. Once art becomes official - arti-ficial,  and open to everyone, then it becomes the new slavery." 

He tossed the phone down onto the table. "How can I support an idea like that? If art is ever given the keys to the city, it will be because it's been so watered down, rendered so impotent, that it's not worth fighting for."


She reminded him that he had said a poet is of no more use to the state than a man who spends his time playing ninepins. 


"Of course," Ye shouted. "And why did Plato say poets should be chased out of the republic? Precisely because every poet and every artist is an antisocial being. He's not that way because he wants to be; he can't be any other way. Of course the state has the right to chase him away from its point of view and and if he is really an artist it is in his nature to to not want to be Admitted, because if he is Admitted it can only mean he is doing something which is understood, approved, and therefore old hat.  Worthless.



Anything new, anything worth doing, can't be recognized. People just don't have that much vision." 





“Arts and sciences serve as an anti environment that enable us to perceive the environment.  In a business civilization we have long considered liberal study as providing necessary means of orientation and perception.  When the arts and sciences themselves become environments under conditions of electric circuitry, conventional liberal studies, whether in the arts and sciences, will no longer serve as an anti-environment."

Through the Vanishing Point, 1968




20230421

Mona’s Heiroglyphica or Joaquin and Boaz Afraid





“A man who really needs to come”











Tragedy:  confrontation with what oneself has written and thus ordained for oneself 


If tragedy is that ineluctable collision with what oneself has writ, what then is 3-74?  


His voice will be heard in your mind, in your own language, but it will seem to come from the TV.  When I was listening to Strawberry Fields Forever, the contact with VALIS, the news about Chrissy’s birth defect ie our media and telepathy combined.  Inner/outer, so there is no way to tell if the info arises within you or enters from outside.  These distinctions are abolished (as I well know from the Tensor experience), and the whole set/ground temporal parallaxis may be intrinsic to me using phosphene patterning firing.  Hence, I am no longer blind.


Philip K. Dick, February 1982





Act I:  Lost His Sheep


Red Velvet Corridor 
I Was a Prisoner in Your Skull
Helpless Child 
Live Through Me 
Yum-Yab Killers 
The Beautiful Days 
Volcano 
Mellothumb 
All Lined Up
Surrogate 2 
How They Suffer 
Animus 



Act II:  Jarboe Is Not Afraid


Red Velvet Wound 
The Sound 
Her Mouth Is Filled With Honey
Blood Section 
Hypogirl 
Minus Something 
Empathy 
I Love You This Much 
YRP
Fan's Lament 
Secret Friends 
The Final Sacrifice 
YRP 2
Surrogate Drone 



Act III:  The Amfortas Transformer


No Words / No Thoughts

Reeling the Liars In

Jim

My Birth

You Fucking People Make Me Sick

Inside Madeline 

Eden Prison

Little Mouth


Press play when you see:

(A24/4/21:  See with Spanish subtitles where available)

2nd Viewing:  



“My brain is so exhausted that fatigue-images appear, by pure physical reflex action; they are not astral things at all. 

And now I have conquered the fatigue by will. And by placing the shew-stone upon my forehead, it sends cool electric thrills through my brain, so as to refresh it, and make it capable of more rapture.”




20230401

The Act or The Word: You’re Going To Be Here 90 Days




Chapter 14


FACING US, SMILING a moon-wide smile, Mark LeClair said, "What if a symphony orchestra was intent only on reaching the final coda? What would become of the music? One great crash of sound, over as soon as possible. The music is in the process, the unfolding; if you hasten it, you destroy it. Then the music is over. I want you to think about that." 


Okay, I said to myself. I'll think about it. There is nothing on this particular day I'd prefer to think about.  It happened, something important, but I do not wish to remember it. No one does. I can see it around me, this same reaction. My reaction in the others.  


Tom and Krystyn paid that crank, that quack psychic and medium, down in Santa Cruz, who wrecked us all. One hundred dollars appears to be the magic sum; it opens the door to enlightenment. Which is why I am here. My life is devoted to seeking enlightenment, as are the other lives around me. This is the noise of the Bay Area, the racket and din of meaning: this is what we exist for: to learn. Teach us, Wiz, I said to myself. Tell me something I don't know. I, being deficient of comprehension, yearn to know. You can begin with me; I am the most attentive of your pupils. I trust everything you utter. I am the perfect fool, come here to take. Give. Keep on with the sounds; it lulls me and I forget. 


“What's your name?" LeClair asked. "Angel Archer," I said. "Why are you here?" "To get away," I said. "From what?" "Everything." I said. "Why?" "It hurts," I said. "Stanley , you mean?" "Yes," I said. "And more. Other things." "I was noticing you," LeClair said, "because you were asleep. You may not have realized it. Did you realize it?" "I realized it," I said. "Is that how you want me to perceive you? As asleep?" "Let me alone," I said. "Let you sleep, then." "Yes," I said. "The sound of one hand clapping." LeClair quoted. I said nothing. "Do you want me to hit you? Cuff you? To wake you up?" "I don't care," I said. "It doesn't matter to me." "What would it take to awaken you?" 


"My job is to wake people,” Mark explained, convinced now of the gravity.


"You are another synchronicity freak, you know that the Holy Spirit, Hagia Sophia is communicated through synchronicity; and that artists like Joyce, Beethoven, and as of yesterday, Frank Zappa’s band.  The Mothers compose music that leads to composition of ground, Binah.  Nuit." 


“Yes; I fish for fish.  Not for souls. I do not know of 'soul'; I only know of fish. A fisherman fishes for fish; if he thinks he fishes for anything else, he is a fool; he deludes himself and those he fishes for." "Fish for me, then," I said. "What do you want?" "Not ever to wake up." "Then come up here," Barefoot said. "Come up and stand beside me. I will teach you how to sleep. It is as hard to sleep as it is to wake up. You sleep poorly, without skill. I can teach you that as easily as I can teach you to wake up. Whatever you want you can have. Are you sure you know what you want? Maybe you secretly want to wake up. You may be wrong about yourself. Come on up here." He reached out his hand. "Don't touch me," I said as I walked toward him. "I don't want to be touched." "So you know that." "I am sure of that," I said. "Maybe what is wrong with you is that no one has ever touched you," Barefoot said. "You tell me," I said. "I have nothing to say. Whatever I had to say- "You have never said anything," Barefoot said. "You have been silent all your life. Only your mouth has talked." "If you say so. "Tell me your name again." "Angel Archer." "Do you have a secret name? That no one knows?" "I have no secret name," I said. And then I said, "I am traitor." "Who did you betray?" "Family," I said. 


"Well, Traitor," Barefoot said, "talk to me about you bringing your family to ruin. How did you do it?" "With words," I said. "Like now." "You are good with words." "Very good," I said. "I am a sickness, a word-sickness. I was taught it by professionals." "I have no words," Barefoot said. "Okay," I said. "Then I will listen." 


"Now you begin to know." I nodded. "Do you have any pets at home?" Barefoot said. "Any dogs or cats? An animal?" "Two cats," I said. "Do you groom them and feed them and care for them? Are you responsible for them? Do you take them to the vet when they're ill?" "Sure," I said. "Who does all that for you?" "For me?" I said. "No one." "Can you do it for yourself?" "Yes, I can," I said. "Then, Angel Archer, you are alive." "Not intentionally," I said. "But you are. You don't think so but you are. Under the words, the disease of words, you are alive. I am trying to tell you this without using words but it is impossible. All we have is words. Sit down again and listen. Everything I say from now on, today, is directed at you: I am speaking to you but not with words. Does that make any sense to you?" "No," I said. "Then just sit down," Barefoot said. I reseated myself. 


"Angel Archer," Barefoot said, "You are wrong about self. You are not sick; you are starved. What killing you is your hunger. Words have nothing to do with it. You have been starved all your life. Spiritual things will not help. You don't need them. There are too many spiritual things in the world. far too many. You are a fool, Angel Archer, but not a good kind of fool." I said nothing. "You need real meat," Barefoot said, "and real drink, not spiritual meat and drink. I offer you real food, for your body. so it will grow. You are a starving person who has come here to be fed, but without knowing it. You have no idea why you came here today. It is my job to tell you. When people come here to listen to me speak, I offer them a sandwich. The foolish ones listen to my words; the wise ones eat the sandwich. This is not an absurdity that I tell you, it is the truth. This is something none of you has imagined, but I give you real food and that food is a sandwich; the words, the talking, is only wind-is nothing. I charge you one hundred dollars but you learn something priceless. When your dog or cat is hungry, do you talk to him? No, you give him food. I give you food, but you do not know it. You have everything backward because the university has taught you that; it has taught you wrong. It has lied to you. And now you tell yourselves lies; you have learned how to do it and you do it very well. Take the sandwich and eat; forget about the words. The only purpose in the words was to lure you here." 


Strange. I thought. He means it. Some of my unhappiness began, then, to ebb away. I felt a peacefulness come over me, a loss of suffering. Someone from behind me leaned forward and touched me on the shoulder. "Hi, Angel." I turned around to see who it was. A pudgy-faced youth browm-haired, smiling at me, his eyes guileless. Bill wearing a golf shirt, and gray slacks and, I saw to my surprise, ironed.  "Remember me?" he said softly. "I’m sorry I didn't answer any of your letters. I've been wondering how you've been doing." "Fine," I said. "Just fine." "I guess we better be quiet." He leaned back and folded his arms, intent on what Edgar Barefoot was saying. At the end of his lecture, Barefoot walked over to me; I still sat, unmoving. Bending. Barefoot said, "Are you related to Bishop Archer?" "Yes," I said. "I was his daughter-in-law." "We knew each other," Barefoot said. "Tim and I. For years. It was such a shock, his death. We used to discuss theology." Coming up beside us. Bill stood listening, saying nothing, he still smiled the same old smile I remembered. "And then John Lennon’s death today," Barefoot said. "I hope I didn't embarrass you, bringing you up front like that. But I could see something was wrong. You look better now." I said, "I feel better." "Do you want a sandwich?" Barefoot indicated the people gathered around the table at the rear of the room. "No," I said. Barefoot said, "Then you weren't listening. To what I told you. I wasn't joking. Angel, you can't live on words; words do not feed. Jesus said, 'Man does not live by bread alone'; I say, 'Man does not live by words at all.' Have a sandwich" "Have something to eat, Angel," Bill said. "I don't feel like eating," I said. "I'm sorry." I thought, I'd rather be left alone. Bending down, Bill said, "You look so thin." "My work." I said remotely


"Angel," Edgar Barefoot said, "this is Bill. "We know each other," Bill said. "We're old friends." "Then you know," Barefoot said to me, "that Bill is a bodhisattva." "I didn't know that," I said. Barefoot said, "Do you know what a bodhisattva is, Angel?" "It has something to do with the Buddha," I said. "The bodhisattva is one who has turned down his chance to attain Nirvana in order to turn back to help others," Barefoot said. "For the bodhisattva compassion is as important a goal as wisdom. That is the essential realization of the bodhisattva," "That's fine," I said. "I get a lot out of what Edgar teaches," Bill said to me. "Come on." He took me by the hand. "I'm going to see that you eat something." "Do you consider yourself a bodhisattva?" I said to him. "No," Bill said. "Sometimes the bodhisattva does not know," Barefoot said. "It is possible to be enlightened without knowing it. Also, it is possible to think you are enlightened and yet not be. The Buddha is called 'the Awakened One, because 'awakened means the same as 'enlightened. We all sleep but do not know it. We live in a dream: we walk and move and have our lives in a dream; most of all we speak in a dream; our speech is the speech of dreamers, and unreal." Like now, I thought. What I'm hearing. Bill disappeared; I looked around for him. "He's getting you something to eat," Barefoot said. "This is all very strange," I said. "This whole day has been unreal. It is like a dream; you're right. They're playing all the old Beatles songs on every station." "Let me tell you something that happened to me once," Barefoot said; he seated himself in the chair beside me, bent over, his hands clasped together. "I was very young, still in

school. I attended classes at Stanford, but I did not graduate. I am took a lot of philosophy classes." "So did I” I said. "One day I left my apartment to mail a letter. I had been working on a paper-not a paper to turn in but a paper of my own: profound philosophical ideas, ideas very important to me. There was one particular problem I couldn't figure out, it had to do with Kant and his ontological categories by which the human mind structures experience- "Time, space and causation," I said. "I know. I studied that." "What I realized as I walked along." Barefoot said, "was that, in a very real sense, I myself create the world that I experience; I both make that world and perceive it. As I walked, the correct formulation of this came to me, suddenly, out of the blue. One minute I didn't have it; the next minute I did. It was a solution I'd been striving for over a period of years... I had read Hume, and then I had found the response to Hume's criticism of causation in Kant's writing-now, suddenly, I had a response, and a correctly worked-out response to Kant. I started hurrying Bill reappeared; he held a sandwich and a cup of fruit punch of some sort; these he held out to me. I accepted them reflexively. Continuing, Barefoot said, "I hurried back up the street toward my apartment as fast as I could go. I had to get the satori down on paper before I forgot it. What I had acquired. there on that walk, out of my apartment where I had no access to pen and paper, was a comprehension of a world con- ceptually arranged, a world not arranged in time and space and by causation, but a world as idea conceived in a great mind, the way our own minds store memories. I had caught a glimpse of world not as my own arrangement-by time, space and causation--but as it is in itself arranged: Kant's 'thing-in- itself." "Which can't be known, Kant said," I said. "Which normally can't be known." Barefoot said. "But I had somehow perceived it, like a great, reticulated, arborizing structure of interrelationships, everything organized according to meaning, with all new events entering as accretions; I had never before grasped the absolute nature of reality this way." He paused a moment. "You got home and wrote it down." I said. "No." Barefoot said. "I never wrote it down. As I hurried along. I saw two tiny children, one of them holding a babybottle. They were running back and forth across a street. A lot of cars came along very fast. I watched for a moment and then I went over to them. I saw no adult. I asked them to take me to their mother. They didn't speak English; it was a Spanish neighborhood, very poor... I didn't have any money in those days. I found their mother. She said, 'I don't speak English and closed the door in my face. She was smiling. I remember that. Smiling at me beatifically. She thought I was a salesman. I wanted to tell her that her children would very soon be killed and she shut the door in my face, smiling angelically at me. "So what did you do?" Bill said. Alan Watts said, "I sat down on the curb and watched the two children. For the rest of the afternoon. Until their father came home. He spoke a little English. I was able to get him to understand. He thanked me." "You did the right thing," I said. "So I never got my model of the universe down on paper." Barefoot said. "I just have a dim memory of it. Something like that fades. It was a once-in-a-lifetime satori. Moksha, it is called in India: a sudden flash of absolute comprehension, out of nowhere. What James Joyce means by 'epiphanies, arising from the trivial or without cause at all, simply happening. Total insight into world." He was silent, then. I said, "What I hear you saying is that the life of a Mexican child is -“


"Which way would you have taken?" Alan said to me. "Would you have gone home and written down your philosophical idea, your moksa? Or would you have stayed with the children? "I would have called the police." I said "To have done that." Alan said, "would have required you to go to a phone. To do that you would have had to leave the children." "It's a nice story." I said. "But I knew someone else who told nice stories. He's dead." "Maybe." Barefoot said, "he found what he went to Israel to find. Found it before he died." "I very much doubt that," I said. "I doubt it, too," Barefoot said. "On the other hand, maybe he found something better. Something he should have been looking for but wasn't. What I am trying to tell you is that all of us are unknowing bodhisattvas, unwilling, even; unintentional. It is something forced on us by chance circumstance. All I wanted to do that day was rush home and get my great insight down on paper before I forgot it. It really was a great insight, I have no doubt of that. I did not want to be a bodhisattva. I did not ask to be. I did not expect to be. In those days, I hadn't even heard the term. Anyone would have done what I did." "Not anyone," I said. "Most people would have, I guess," "What would you have done?" Barefoot said. "Given that choice." I said, "I guess I would have done what you did and hoped I'd remember the insight." 


"But I did not remember it," he said. "And that is the point." Bill said to me, then, "Can I hitch a ride with you back to the East Bay? My car got towed off. It threw a rod and I-“

“Sure," I said: I stood up, stiffly: my bones ached. "Mr. Barefoot, I've listened to you on KPFA many times. At first, I thought you were stuffy but now I'm not so sure." "Before you go," Barefoot said, "I want you to tell me how you betrayed your friends." "She didn't," Bill said. "It's all in her mind." Barefoot leaned toward me, he put his arm around me and drew me back to my chair, reseating me. "Well," I said, "I let them die. Especially Tim." "Tim could not have avoided death," Barefoot said. "He went to Israel in order to die. That's what he wanted. Death was what he was looking for. That's why I say. Maybe he found what he was looking for or even something better." Shocked, I said, "Tim wasn't looking for death. Tim put up the bravest fight against fate I ever saw anybody put up." 


"Death and fate are not the same." Barefoot said. "He died to avoid fate, because the fate he saw coming for him was worse than dying there on the Dead Sea Desert. That's why he sought it and that's what he found; but I think he found something better." To Bill he said, "What do you think, Bill?" "I'd rather not say." Bill said. "But you know," Barefoot said to him. "What was the fate you're talking about?" I asked Barefoot. Barefoot said, "The same as yours. The fate that has overtaken you. And that you're aware of." "What is that?" I said. "Lost in meaningless words." Barefoot said. "A merchant of words. With no contact to life. Tim had advanced far into that. I read Here, Tyrant Death several times. It said nothing. nothing at all. Just words. Flatus cocis, an empty noise."


After a moment I said, "You're right. I read it, too." How true it was, how terribly, sadly true. "And Tim realized it." Barefoot said. "He told me. He came to me a few months before his trip to Israel and told me. He wanted me to teach him about the Sufis. He wanted to exchange meaning--all the meaning he'd piled up in his lifetime-for something else. For beauty. He told me about an album of records that you sold him that he never got a chance to play. Beethoven's Fidelio. He was always too busy." "Then you knew who I was already," I said. "Before I told you "That's why I asked you to come up front with me." Barefoot said. "I recognized you. Tim had shown me a picture of you and Jess. At first, I wasn't sure. You're a lot thinner now." "Well, I have a demanding job." I said. Together, Bill Lundborg and I drove back across the Richardson Bridge to the East Bay. We listened to the radio, to the endless procession of Beatles songs. "I knew you were trying to find me," Bill said, "but my life wasn't going too well. I've finally been diagnosed as what they call 'hebephrenic." To change the subject I said, "I hope the music isn't depressing you, I can turn it off." "I like the Beatles," Bill said. "Are you aware of John Lennon's death?" "Sure," Bill said. "Everybody is. So you manage the Musik Shop now. "Yes, indeed," I said. "I have five clerks working under me and unlimited buying power. I've got an offer from Capitol Records to go down to the L.A. area, to Burbank, I guess, and go to work for them. I've reached the top in terms of the retail record business, managing a store is as far as you can go. Except for owning the store. And I don't have the money."


"Do you know what 'hebephrenic means?" "Yes," I said. I thought, I even know the origin of the word. "Hebe was the Greek goddess of youth," I said. "I never grew up." Bill said. "Hebephrenia is characterized by silliness." "Guess so," I said. "When you're hebephrenic," Bill said, "things strike you as funny. Kirsten's death struck me as funny." Then you are indeed hebephrenic, I said to myself as I drove. Because there was nothing funny about it. I said, "What about Tim's death?" "Well, parts of it were funny. That little boxy car, that Datsun. And those two bottles of Coke. Tim probably had shoes on like I have on now." He lifted his foot to show me his Hush Puppies. "At least," I said, "But by and large," Bill said, "it was not funny. What Tim was looking for wasn't funny. Barefoot is wrong about what Tim was looking for, he wasn't looking for death." "Not consciously," I said, "but maybe unconsciously he was. "That's nonsense," Bill said. "All that about unconscious motivation. You can posit anything by reasoning that way. You can attribute any motivation you want, since there's no way it can be tested. Tim was looking for that mushroom. He sure picked a funny place to look for a mushroom: a desert. Mushrooms grow where it's moist and cool and shaded." "In caves," I said. "There are caves there." "Yes, well," Bill said, "it wasn't actually a mushroom any how. That, too, is a supposition. A gratuitous assumption. Tim stole that idea from a scholar named John Allegro. Tim's problem was that he didn't really think for himself; he picked up other people's ideas and believed they had come out of his own mind, whereas, in fact, he stole them." 


“But the ideas had value," I said, "and Tim synthesized them. Tim brought various ideas together." "But not very good ones." Glancing at Bill, I said, "Who are you to judge?" "I know you loved him," Bill said. "You don't have to defend him all the time. I'm not attacking him." "It sure sounds like it." "I loved him, too. A lot of people loved him.  He was a great man, the greatest we'll ever know. But he was a foolish man and you know that." I said nothing. I drove and I half-listened to the radio. They were now playing "Yesterday." "Edgar was right about you, however," Bill said. "You should have dropped out of the university and not finished. You learned too much." With bitterness I said, "Learned too much. Christ. The Tox populi. Distrust of education. I get sick and tired of hearing that shit, I am glad of what I know." "It's wrecked you," Bill said. "You can just go take a flying fling," I said. Bill said calmly, "You are very bitter and very unhappy. You are a good person who loved Krystyn and Tim and Geoff and you haven't gotten over what happened to them. And your education has not helped you cope with this." "There is no coping with this!" I said, with fury. "They all were good people and they are all dead!" "Your fathers ate manna in the desert and they are all dead." "What's that?" "Jesus says that. I think it's said during Mass. I attended Mass a few times with Kirsten, at Grace Cathedral. One time, when Tim was passing the chalice around-Kirsten was kneeling at the rail-he secretly slipped a ring around her finger. No one saw but she told me. It was a symbolic wedding ring. Tim had on all his robes, then." "Tell me about it," I said, bitterly. "I am telling you about it. Did you know-" "I knew about the ring." I said. "She told me. She showed it to me." "They considered themselves spiritually married. Before and in the eyes of God. Although not according to civil law. "Your fathers ate manna in the desert and they are all dead.' That refers to the Old Testament. Jesus brings-" "Oh, my good God," I said, "I thought I'd heard the last of all this stuff. I don't want ever to hear any more. It didn't do any good then and it won't ever do any good. Barefoot talks about useless words-those are useless words. Why would Barefoot call you a bodhisattva? What is all this compassion and wisdom you have? You attained Nirvana and came back to help others, is that it?" "I could have attained Nirvana," Bill said. "But I turned it down. To return." "Forgive me," I said, with weariness, "I don't understand what you're talking about. Okay?" Bill said, "I came back to this world. From the next world. Out of compassion. That is what I learned out there in the Desert." His voice was calm; his face showed a deep calm. "That is what I found." I stared at him. "I am," Bill said. "I have come back from the other side. To those I love." He smiled a vast and secret smile.


Adapted from The Transmigration of Timothy Archer, Philip K. Dick

20230226

(Not) The Dark Side of the Moon






 

“Liberals can understand everything but people
who don't understand them.”

Lenny Bruce


“I have no hope.  I think if you have hope, what are you fucking seven?”


Marc Maron





Karma.  What is it good for?  Is it something that can be reduced to simple cause and effect, or is it one of those truths that reveals itself slowly.  Not over months or years, but decades and centuries.

















VALIS:  Set-ground. Camouflage.  


Macro-soma blended into the universe in countless ways, here and there: a glint here, a word on a page, plural objects and their causal

processes.   A ripple of wind in the weeds in the alley. 


VALIS is not the universe but is blended into it, as is Ubik


My problem is too much intellect and too little awe and reverence. What I have to realize is that both 2-3-74 and 11-17-80 are self-authenticating.  But consider the aspect of the ancient in VALIS.

 

The template was devised a long time ago but it applies to the now; that is the whole point — (1) it is ancient; and (2) it applies to the now — this is both the paradox and the revelation: the secret is here.  


How the ancient can be the now.  If you can understand this, you have the answer.”


PKD, December 1980





20230204

Helter Skelter Vol. 10: Thomas, Can You See Me?


There’s only one gnostic experience, you’ll never have it again.  Once you have it, you are having it every day.


You do not come by knowledge of your own volition.  When the student is ready, actually, it’s not when the student is ready, it’s when the pupil is ready, the Master appears.  And that Master is the first physical principle of reality, the birth of the Universe.  You see it in your mind’s eye, and in no way could I claim that I understood it when I first saw it.  It drove me into research, and some would say that I have come to a state of confirmation bias, but I know that it isn’t true, because like a foolish kid who is just joking around with a teacher, I actually sketched it out.  And I didn’t even remember doing that really until decades later.  After I had my gnostic experience, I realized I had already seen this dozens of times before.  I just didn’t recognize it for what it was.


Mark LeClair, 2012





"I shall choose you, one out of a thousand, and two out of ten thousand, and they shall stand as a single one." 
































 
"When you make the two one, and when you make the inside like the outside and the outside like the inside, and the above like the below, and when you make the Vision and the Voice one and the same, so that the Vision not be Vision nor the Voice; and when you fashion eyes in the place of an eye, and a hand in place of a hand, and an ear in place of a an ear, and a meme in place of a meme; then will you enter the kingdom."

20230202

Let Me Finish My Code





 

“You know, it’s a strange thing to make the claim of complete gnosis, and I am making that claim.

I don’t believe there’s anything I can learn about reality that I don’t already know.  I can only learn details that always seem to fit perfectly into this picture.  This leads to problems with concepts of sanity, and confirmation bias and all that other stuff.  And that’s part of the reason I put my blog out there is because I want people to say to me, you know, “you are totally fucking crazy, dude”. And “What do you make of this, what do you make of this?” And you know, so far nobody’s been able to knock me off my perch.”

Mark LeClair, 2012