20121204

High Definition Plate Tectonics


"It’s all SYNC, we just go right out and say it.  Whereas like, it’s completely implied when we say ‘sync,' but when you look at it, what are the prime tools that are being used to extrapolate the information with these different systems?  The O.T.O. is obviously one of them.  Mysticism across the board plays with correspondences, so “this corresponds to this”.  But then you’re basically, you’re getting information because of how these two things connect, or three things, or whatever.  So, you’re like “how does this relate to this?”  There’s information inherent in the relationship that you wouldn’t get with the thing alone.  You watch the Wizard of Oz, a really good movie with lots of symbolism, then you put it on mute and you watch it with Dark Side of the Moon and you get a whole other message.  Whereas, if you listen to Dark Side of the Moon all by itself, it’s a really great album all on its own, with its own set of symbolism.  But the two together produce something that you wouldn’t have otherwise.  So 777, Crowley’s book of correspondences, I mean, all that is is ‘sync’. That whole book is ‘sync’.  A ‘sync’ handbook.  That’s foundational, in terms of the work.

And you want it to be instantaneous, that’s the goal.  

So as soon as you say “geburah” you want to be able to visualize the corresponding color,  you want to be visualizing:  “Boom, RED, ok…”.  Then everything that comes with that.  Then you’re like “Mars”, and what does Mars mean?


You don’t want a conceptual understanding of Mars, 
you want an energetic understanding of Mars.  

You want to be in touch with what we’re talking about when we say “Mars”, beyond any image of the planet.  What are we getting at here?  What are we looking at?  Ok, so you’re like, "Mars has to do with tobacco or cocaine" which would be signifiers of Mars energy.  What do those things have in common?  Severity.  But that’s just one example, and how does this relate to this?"

David Plate, from Episode 29 of Always Record


Read more from David Plate, and 25 other voices in The Sync Book 2 out now.

20120625

The Rubix Cube Part 4: I Never Remember It

What if you simply CAN'T solve the Rubix Cube?  What if no matter how hard you try, no matter how many hours you put into the study and practice of the thing, solving the Rubix Cube remains IMPOSSIBLE.

Are you this person?  Or can you solve the Rubix Cube?

I can't.

Even with the directions right in front of you?  

I can't.                                                                                                

Even with thirteen different videos explaining it step by step? 

I can't.                                                                                                         

Even with a personal tutor who actually shows you each individual move?  

I can't.                                                                                                          

What if I give you a million dollars?

Gimme that fuckin' Cube.                                            

                                                                                                                                                                                                       

HELP!


FUCK.  I still can't solve the Cube.  I just can't, I don't know what's wrong with me.  What does this mean?  Should I keep trying?  I've been working on it for a month now and it seems like I'll never figure it out.  

TIME.  MONEY.  WILL POWER.  NOTHING WORKS I TELL YOU.  NOTHING.  THIS IS COMPLETELY STUPID, I'M A GOOD PERSON, AND THIS CUBE MAKES ME FEEL BAD.  I HATE THIS CUBE.  I HATE IT.  FUCK YOU, FUCK THE RUBIX CUBE.  FUCK YOU FOR MAKING ME FEEL INFERIOR.  FUCK YOU FOR EVEN CREATING IT.  I WILL NOT ALLOW YOU TO MAKE ME FEEL THIS WAY.  I WILL NEVER LET ANYONE MAKE ME FEEL THIS WAY EVER AGAIN, AND I WILL NEVER LET ANYONE MAKE MY CHILDREN FEEL THIS WAY.  

I BET THERE NEVER WAS A MILLION DOLLARS TO BEGIN WITH.  YOU'RE A LIAR. 
 I KNOW YOU'RE A LIAR.


If you don't solve the Rubix Cube by the end of the year, I'm going to kill everyone you love, and then I'm going to throw you in Prison.  Do you understand?  DO YOU THINK I'M LYING NOW?
Get back to work.

Where is that Voice coming from?  Hey, who are you?  And who are you to threaten ME?    


The clock is ticking…..




20120617

The Rubix Cube Part 3: Always Engrave


Image courtesy of MK Ultrasound


"Let the meme fight for its life in the jungle of competing models of reality...


When I pull back from the specificity and the fact that I invented it that's my biggest problem.  If I hadn't invented this, if I had just heard that somebody invented it, and this is what it was, I think I would find it very interesting.  But since I know the inventor very well, I'm very prone to doubt the thing.  I mean, this is not a guy you would want to put a lot of pressure on so….

I - I don't know.  

I'm puzzled.




And I offer it as an unsolved puzzle."


Terence McKenna





"Chaos is a state where information can exist, but where it does not exist."
Aryeh Kaplan


Our physical body is the extension of a billion year system of order called DNA.  DNA is a communication system intent on impregnating the future with the past through a novelty conserving game of elemental telephone.  One of the most complex products of this game is an organ of matter called brain, a physical computer capable of executing billions of actions every second, each decision intimately related to the scope of an entire physical body.

The human brain, along with that of the dolphin, are two of the most prominent examples of this.  

A specific and recent extension of the human brain is the human neocortex (Latin for "new bark"), a six-layered membrane responsible for language, conscious thought, unconscious thought, dreaming, spatial reasoning, sensory perception, and the generation of motor commands.  Not only is it capable of perception and projection, it is capable of simultaneous perception and projection.  It is the observer as well as the observed, the engraver and the engraved.  It creates as it destroys.

I believe that it is the neocortex that is the sole/soul biological membrane that is in direct contact with Mind/God/TAO/non-locality.  It is through this connection that the silent, seamless, and ordered system of DNA is finally questioned and brought into doubt.

Is the complex reality of physical existence radically dis-ordered?  Or is it ordered by the divine?

Are we drowning in blind chaos?  Or are we swimming amidst perfection?

"From above to below we know.  But from below to above we do not know"

I nominate the six-layered Rubix Cube as an externalized representation of the human neocortex independently removed from its bio-physical firmament.  An externalized model, the Rubix Cube gives us a chance to visualize and interact with the Bridge between brain and Mind, and a chance to understand why some brains seem to be more in contact with Mind than others.  Why some brains remain in contact with Mind.

If the standard brain has a knowledge of the permutations of the Cube, it can gradually develop an understanding of how to arrive at certain specific permutations.   Brain can then begin to develop a stronger connection to Mind.   A deeper connection to Mind.  A connection capable of handling a flood of wisdom, if that flood should happen to occur.




"I preached here earlier that you mustn't seek closure
 and so I don't with this.

If it's a communication, it's a very curious communication.  If it is non-communication, it's even more curious.  If it's a delusion, why is it so mathematically formal?  If I'm pathological, why aren't there attendant sequelae?  Why just this very defined thing?

The whole thing smacks of the impossible.  It's even pushed me towards the idea that maybe this is not actually a reality.   We're trapped, or I'm trapped.  I don't know if you're trapped, but we're in some kind of piece of fiction.  It's like a Philip K. Dick deal, you know, some kind of simulacrum, and the clue to the fact that it's a simulacrum is this impossible idea, and so the point of the idea is not to believe it, but to use it as a wedge to fight our way out of this labyrinth and back to whatever reality we were in before we fell in to this situation.  Something like that.

Anyway I have the feeling that I'm blathering and spinning my wheels…"

Terence McKenna


20120614

The Rubix Cube Part 2: Back to the Future


Ok, if we can't solve this thing on our own, what's the fucking point?




Time to cheat.  That's right, cheat.  If our ancestors are good for anything, they are good for a few hints and shortcuts.  We can learn from their wisdom.  We must follow the path. 

Using the written directions included, it took me around six hours to solve the Cube for the first time.  It was confusing and frustrating, and I didn't actually believe the directions would work until the final few turns of the cube.  It took me about 45 minutes the second time, and about 30 minutes the third.  

Go and do this.  See how long it takes you.  

What you will realize is that even with the written directions, solving the Cube is still an extremely difficult endeavor, SO difficult that most people can not or simply WILL NOT solve the Cube.  Try to imagine the excuses they make for giving up, even with the solution right in front of them:

"The directions are bullshit, this is stupid, what's the point, it's broken, I'm stupid, it's a waste of time, this is a joke, it's impossible, I'm too tired, only a moron would waste time on this, it's just too difficult, I'm no good at math, I'm not going to let this ruin my day, I give up, I've got more important things to do, the directions are wrong"

Don't judge them, rather, try to recognize situations in your own life where you may have used the same excuses.

After you have solved the Cube, try to solve the Cube again, but in half the time.  Then commit the process to memory, and solve it without the training wheels.  Then with the pressure of an audience.  Challenge yourself to become quicker, faster.

Congratulations!  You can now solve the Rubix Cube. 

When I say You, I mean Robot.  A Robot solved the Cube.

Please, do not kid yourself that you have done anything more than install the Rubix Cube Solution program in your brain.  Or did you forget?

We cheated.  We took the shortcut.  




The fall (bababadalgharaghtakamminarronnkonnbronntonnerronntuonnthunntrovarrhounawnskawntoohoohoor-denenthurnuk!) of a once wallstrait oldparr is retaled early in bed and later
on life down through all christian minstrelsy. The great fall of the
offwall entailed at such short notice the pftjschute of Finnegan, erse solid man, that the humptyhillhead of humself promptly sends an unquiring one well to the west 
in quest of his tumptytumtoes: and their upturnpikepointandplace is at the knock out in the park
where oranges have been laid to rust upon the green since devlinsfirst loved livvy.

James Joyce

Joyce recognized that this is what was happening with language and history.  McLuhan understood Joyce, and recognized that this was happening with literacy and media as well.  Kubrick understood them both, and recognized that this was no accident.








The Rubix Cube: Gone in Ninety Three Seconds



I just bought a Rubix Cube. When I opened up the box it came in,  I marveled at how elegant a simple piece of plastic could be.  Elegant, yet surprisingly loud, as all six colors shouted for individual attention.

And fragile.

The untouched Cube is a very Zen object.  It reflects all six senses, forever entangled, but never as pure as this.  A newborn, a child, a virgin.

I'm 36, and I had one of these Cubes when I was 5 years old.  As I examine this identical Cube three decades later, I try to consider the Cube from the perspective of a child who finds one sitting anonymously on a shelf surrounded by other toys, toys that shout and rattle and beckon for attention.  What could possibly attract the child to the Cube?

Boredom clears a path to this cube.  Boredom destroys this inertia.

"What does it do?  What is it for?  What just happened?"



In less than sixty seconds, the singularity of the Cube will dissolve at the hands of the child, its Zen-like purity hopelessly lost into one of the 43,252,003,274,489,856,000 different permutations.  That's "quintillion".

The child will never bring the Cube back to the way it was.  Decades later, the child may never believe that it was ever possible to begin with.

Buy a Rubix Cube today, and see how long it takes before you fuck it up.  Before you are completely and utterly LOST.  Without cheating, without reading a book of directions, and without watching a video on YouTube, try to bring all six sides back to that original star, that one in a quintillion singularity.  Siriusly, find your way back.  To your Home.

But at least you know this time.  You know for certain that somewhere in the endlessly mutating pattern is that solid state six colored cube, that singularity, that newborn that you started with at the beginning.  How could you forget?  You just fucking had it right there, just a god damn minute ago.  Where did it go?

Ask yourself, "Am I up to it?"

 Can you meet the challenge of restoring the Cube?  Because what you have here is a Sword in a Stone.  This, this is the challenge of Isis, and the wound of Amfortas.  This is the mystery of Resurrection.

If you let it, this $8.99 Cube can be a mirror for your mind, and for what the human mind is capable of.  It can be a mirror for the Robot mind, and for what the Robot mind is capable of.  It can be a canvas for the Artist, and an instrument of deception.


What do you see?  What can you see? Who do you see?

What are you going to do?




20120611

ADM Men 23: Who is this person writing about?


"Oh, totally. I find him very funny. A bizarre spectacle. Impossible to tell if and when he is serious. The perfect successor of (?) who also managed to maintain a decades long intellectual hoax. Amazing stuff! (If you want a real brilliant WTF, check out (?).
Would I recommend others to read his books? No, probably not. Or maybe, as a kinda mean joke to play on someone deserving. Because before you can find him funny you have to take him seriously for a while. And before you are used to his writing it is mostly unreadable. (Or, at least unreadable to those of us without a background in (?), or similar.)

I will now tell you my dirty secret of how to read his bullshit. (?). All his books should be sold with a small quantity of quality (?), anything else is unnecessarily cruel to the user. Only drug induced hyper-focus allows one to plough right through this stuff while not worrying too much about whether it actually means anything. And then do a repeat reading, this time after (?). Giggle copiously. Under no circumstance approach his work sober!"
by someone on Tue Mar 22nd, 2011 at 12:43:32 PM EST 


Is this person writing about:


 Seuss


 Jung


 Zizek


Crowley


20120610

ADM Men 2: Children of the Bomb


Ours is the first age in which many thousands of the best-trained individual minds have
 made it a full-time business to get inside the collective public mind.  To get inside in order 
to manipulate, exploit, control is the object now.  And to generate heat not light is the intention.  
To keep everybody in the helpless state engendered by prolonged mental rutting is the 
effect of many ads and much entertainment alike.

Marshall McLuhan, 1951:


MAD MEN:  Season One, Episode 6  "Babylon"

The next medium, whatever it is - it may be the extension of consciousness - will include television as its content, not as its environment, and will transform television into an art form. A computer as a research and communication instrument could enhance retrieval, obsolesce mass library organization, retrieve the individual's encyclopedic function and flip into a private line to speedily tailored data of a salable kind.

Marshall McLuhan,  1962

Marshall McLuhan serves as a bridge between the two greatest artistic geniuses of the 20th century, James Joyce and Stanley Kubrick.  And, in my opinion, in order to understand McLuhan, you have to understand all three.  Matthew Weiner clearly understands all three.



Essential to the understanding of Joyce, McLuhan, and Kubrick, one must have an understanding of how the Qabbalistic Tree of Life and the Tarot are related, how this system is related to reality, and how reality is made of language.  Again, Matthew Weiner clearly understands all three.



The above image serves as the basis for Matthew Weiner's production logo.  It is The Sun, the 20th of 22 Trump cards in the Major Arcana of the Rider Waite Tarot, and is one of those loose threads that, when given a gentle tug, can unravel the whole sweater.  

The question is, do you want to know what's under the sweater?


The Sun is associated with the Hebrew letter reish, which is associated with the head.  This head is filled with "ego-consciousness", which feels itself separated from the unity of God.  Only the fear of God can ready this "ego-consciousness" for wisdom.


Interesting pattern in that background, no?





20120605

ADM Men: A New Model of Virtual Reality


I was around four years old when I met God.  He reached out and shook my hand, and I'll never forget it.  

I was 18 when I got kicked out of the Garden.  I think Adam and Eve said it best: "It was the best of times, it was the worst of times."

I was 19 when I became a Boddhisattva.  Sometimes I struggle with the decision I made that night, but it's cool.

I went to Hell when I was 31.  Honestly, I did, and the truth is, I might still be there.

I was 35 when I finally figured it out, and this I know:  We still have some work to do.




20120602

Master of Donuts




Reasons for eating donuts:


1.  My "hunger" is very bad right now.


2.  To give me energy.


3.  I can't work without donuts.


4.  I can't stay alert without donuts.


5.  I must be at my best to do what I have to do.


6.  I must show I am MASTER of donuts - free to say either YES or NO.  And I must be perfectly sure by saying YES at the moment.  My refusal at the moment shows weakness, therefore I eat donuts.


7.  In spite of the knowledge of the disadvantages of donuts, I am really not sure whether it isn't better than the other life.  After all, I have an extraordinary control over my emotions through donuts.


8.  It is dangerous to stop eating donuts too suddenly.


9.  I'd better take a small donut now rather than put it off till later; because if I do so, it will disturb my sleep.


10.  It is really very bad for the mind to be constantly preoccupied with the question of donuts.  It is better to take a small donut to rid myself of the obsession.


11.  I am worried about donuts because of my not having any.  If I were to eat one, my mind would clear up immediately, and I should be able to think out good plans for stopping it.


12.  The gods may be leading me to some new experience through eating donuts.


13.  It is quite certainly a mistake putting down all little discomforts as the result of eating donuts. Very likely, all of them are illusions, and simply my own illusions of GUILT.  I am simply scaring myself into saying NO.


14.  I must not be a coward and say NO.


15.  There is no evidence at all that the REASONABLE use of donuts shortens life.  In fact it ENRICHES life, and we all know that HAPPY people live longer than DEPRESSED and SAD people.


16.  I take it because donuts are prohibited.  I decline being treated like a silly schoolboy when I'm a responsible man.


17.  My friend likes me to eat donuts with her.


18.  My ability to eat donuts shows my superiority over other people.


19.  I have given up most vices, donuts allow me to still enjoy life, and that isn't a crime.


20.  So-and-so has eaten donuts for years and is all right.


21.  So-and-so has eaten donuts for years, is still eating them, and is the most remarkable man of his century.


22.  I am feeling very, very rotten, and a very, very small donut would make me feel so very, very good.


23.  We can't stop when it is available EVERYWHERE.  The temptation is too strong.  Plus, we can't just throw donuts away.


24.  Suppose I take all the pains to stop using and then I get cancer or something right away, what a FOOL I would be!




20120522

Helter Skelter Vol. 4: I Can't Live Without Fidelio




LL
June 22, 2011

Klaus:

Looks like I'm going to really spend some time with "Metaphor".  The mathematical language is beyond my immediate grasp.  I'm think, for now, I'm going to put it to the side, but I look forward to returning to it.  Some quotes that jumped out at me:

"Thus, we have indicated, the thought-object itself cannot be depicted explicitly within the domain of the communication medium. However, the reference to such a thought-object can be recognized by a hearer whose mind contains the sibling of that same thought-object."

"Otherwise, only if such suitable primary sources are not available, we should rely upon paraphrases which effectively and fairly state the true paradox associated with that original discovery."

"This form of classroom introduction to such original sources has a required order, as the ordering of Euclid's Elements of geometry illustrates, from a formalist standpoint, the notion of a choice of such an order. Secondly, the ordering is determined by the consideration, that mastery of one discovery is virtually prerequisite for the comprehension of a successor in that series. The sound secondary curriculum teaches geometry and the plastic arts, as the domain of visual experience, as, in parallel, the student concurrently learns language, literature, and music—the domain of hearing."

LeClair:

Hey William,

Just chilling this evening. Taking a cut off from the cut up. I have a rare occurrence of responsibilities to manage over the next several days, so I may find little time through the week end... but don't worry. I'll be back at it.

Pax

Klaus:

Good call.  Talk to you soon.




Eyes Walled Shut
June 22-23, 2011

Klaus:

First cycle through.  Speechless.
Did you honestly just discover this Wall/EWS yesterday?  I trust that what you represent is accurate, but it's really, really, really eye opening.

LeClair:

Yes sir.

I speak the truth to you hear, without the slightest distortion. It happened just as I say.

Before last night I had never heard "The Wall" and it has been over two years since I have watched EWS

LeClair:

Hey William,

I noticed the misspelling of "hear/here" in my above email, and I couldn't help myself.  I need to say a little more here, just a word or two.

I'm not one for dramatics, but I give you my word that in our discussion I have never even remotely distorted the truth.  There are alot of e-shennanigans going on out there, but that is not my style, and even if I were likely to engage in such foolery, I think this subject is far too interesting and fragile for anything other than complete and careful honesty.  I do not expect you to trust me as we may continue, but I hope you will.

In spite of my natural tendency to explore frontiers of information, I do not think I would have made this discovery without prompting from you.  Further, I think that there may be a link between you and me, a link with a highly charged potential.  Given the few hits at Floyd/Kubrick site, and adding the ridicule I have had to deal with when I try to broach this subject, I suspect there are not many people who are after the same magic.  I mean... it is scary.  A can of worms.

I am grateful that there is just one person with whom I can express this particular vein of thought in a detail that is not widely appreciated, and who seems to be touched by the same spectral influence.  I will treat this relationship with respect.

I have just completed my second full play of Pink Eyes Wide Shut and it was every bit as powerful the first time around.  One thought that occurred to me is that Kubrick is "another brick in the wall" and that this album is a critique of the underlying cruelty of Kubrick's work.  This may seem like  a stretch, but I have my rationale, which will surely come out in our investigation.

I may have a little time tomorrow to look at "A Pillow of Winds", and if I can I'll send you my thoughts.  Otherwise, I'm  likely out of the game until Monday.  Lot of household chores this weekend.

Talk soon,

Mark    




Quick Reply
June 23-27, 2011

Klaus:

Thematically, Pink Eyes is in tune, and my focus on this connection was monopolized, but there are some literal lyric-to-image synchs that are DEAD ON, too many, just as if K drops a few atomic bombs along the way as a kid randomly lights firecrackers.  The exactness of these connections distracted me, in the sense that it made me recognize that this was THE MASTER WORK of K and Pink.

  PKD uses a term, "enantiodromia", used by Heraclitus, then Jung, to "describe the tendency for the psyche to overcome deepseated psychic resistance by shifting (seemingly suddenly) to the opposite pole of attitude, belief, and emotion".  It's a psychic "2012".  I usually undergo this during hallucinogenic work, or intense marijuana visions (if I haven't smoked in a long time).  But the tandem of Shining and EWS and our dialogues sent me hurtling through an entire pole shift of confidence and meaning.  I kind of expected it, was kind of ready for it.  I expect that you may be very in tune to this phenomonom, judging by your direct response.

This enantiodromia is a kind of vertigo, a distortion, a Mirror image, a conscious nightmare, the content of which remains in the brain more lucidly than a dream.  I needed to banish the residues of those visions by humbly asking you directly about the Pink Eye origins.  I hadn't the strength in that moment to reconstruct the trust that I have in this.  Thanks for understanding.

Trust in my words as well, I present my feedback directly and honestly.

Talk to you Monday.

LeClair:

Cool, bro...

Talk Soon.

LeClair:

Hey WK,

Did you have a good weekend?  I got all my chores done and managed to get in two more complete plays of PEWS, once without the subtitles.  The exhilaration of this "discovery" is just about the finest I've ever felt, and I have had more than a few thrills in my life.  I am excited to get back into our discussion about The Pink Shining.  

Before I get into APOW, I want to sum up some thoughts on OOTD and also address a few vital points you suggest in your mails.

- Water.

The "light blue" book and album colors and the movie credit titles are the idealization of the color of Water.  In The Pink Shining this calls to mind the bathroom and kitchen, and the distorted sound effects that make these rooms different from other household space. Think of "singing in the shower" and therefore "Singing in the Rain".  "Singing in the Rain", a movie about the attempt to bring sound to the movies, I spoonerize as "Reining in the Sing", which describes the enclosure of a space in a wall of sound barrier.  Could it be that prior to the age of sound reproduction and synch, that we lived somehow outside of sound, "outside the wall", in a world of silent psychic imagery, with the music of the spheres as audio track?  Does this idea in any way relate to a period of time in the womb (caul field)?  Pink Eyes has alot to say on this subject.  There is something here about sound "underwater" that links nicely with "Comfortably Numb".  "You are only coming through in waves..." and the like.  But I glean more depth from the conflation of water with light.

Underneath the "blue" title credits, Jack drives the "yellow" VW.  As idealization of the bodily process, water is "blue" going in and "yellow"coming out.  These two colors are also noticed in the theory of an object moving at light speed, which approaches yellow and departs blue.  I could be wrong on the succession, maybe approach is blue and egress is yellow, but I am certain about the coloring.

As we have the "86" and "8/6" reference attached to the same images, I suggest this reinforces my theory that the Japanese detonations serve some sort of "time busting" purpose.  In my earlier mail I suggest the bombs are designed to "outpace the sun", but I would add that maybe this has to do with achieving light-speed tech.  Moreover, because the innate references to sounds cells, this same"'blue/yellow" connection could relate to Moon Landing tech, which is to say, the tech that allows for the possibility of leaving the "echo-drome" that is the Earth's atmosphere.

And together it all seems bound to the emerging Age of Aquarius and the Magick of Dee and Kelley through Crowley, Hubbard and Parsons, all of which is obsessed with the Moon and Sun.  There is a poem by Golden Dawn-er Yeats that suggests the destination of the soul is the Sun, by way of the Moon's orbit.  It is found in the epilogue to his "A Vision".  I intuit something like this: the Moon is the key to a Solar "stargate".  This is theme is present in the first verse of "Echoes", which I'll get to when I look at mirrors in detail.  Because of the anal-pedophila implied in "The Shining", along with data from some other research3 regarding the occult nature of the "stargate", I am stuck on the connection to the Sun as "anus" as expressed by Bataille in his short surrealist essay "The Solar Anus".  It gets into many ideas that gel with our investigation.

This imagery of Water is chilling when considering the McKenna link you sent to me.  Think of the refractive quality of water, which "splits" the image.  Christ bears a pitcher of water.  McKenna says Christ is the demiurgic presence that "splits" the time stream of human history.  Let's say McKenna's interp of his vision is correct.  Could it not be then inferred that Kubrick's work is a competitive technology, designed to give an ominous tone to the chance at reality outside of the BIP?  And if so, could one not simply reverse the whole model to imply that McKenna and his ilk are wolves in sheep's clothes, concealing an unknown danger, attempting to draw as many in as possible with false promises of spiritual transformation, and that Kubrick and others are trying, on the psychic level to sound a warning?  I walk the line on these questions.

 - Nice hit on that sandwich/cunnilingus pairing.  The jam on his cheeks is decidedly lurid.  It reminds me of 69 from "The Book of Lies" which ends with the admonition "...little children, love one another".

- About "Catcher".  It occurs to me that the final image of the book is of Holden (hold-in-caul-field) watching his little sister ride a carousel.  "Carousel" the musical brings "You'll Never Walk Alone".  I consider the title of this song may be a cryptic threat, given by the "all-seeing" demiurge to his malformed creation.  Add to this the notorious rep of "Catcher" as some sort of MKUltra trigger.  The poster in the Overlook games-room reads "Monarch" and "SKI" and shines a bright light into the eyes, in the technique of an interrogator or torturer.  The letters "K" and "I" from SKI are pressed together in such a way that one could read SKI as SK in a stylized font.  The implication of this image is massive, but at the least it seems to indicate the hand of Stanley as practitioner of the Monarch Mind Control program.  As I stated re: Pink Eyes Wide Shut, I think Waters may have "busted" the code and delivered "The Wall" as a critique on Kubrick's skullduggery.  I further posit the possibility that Pink Eyes Wide Shut is Stan's response to that critique.  

- You might be amused to note that the first four blue letters that overlay Jack's VW are RI and CH and the last four are ec and BU which unscramble into CUBERICH.

APOW plays from

00:06:11 to 00:11:22
00:46: 57 to 00:52:55
01:39:39 to 01:44:50

The links seem pretty straight forward, but there are a few interesting subtleties.

- Each play sets the stage for the increasing theme of isolation.  Of being closed in.  This fits in with either the gnostic BIP idea, or the sub-gnostic "lost in space" concept that I favor.  There is a nice parody of reversal in the idea of Summer/Winter.  I think APOW expresses a wintry quality, but lyrically refers to many seasons.  The regular staff of the Overlook will have their summer, their vacation, during the winter, and the Torrances are on vacation of sorts at the empty winter hotel.

- Two plays take place in the caretaker's bedroom, sitting on the bed.  APOW makes reference to sleep and being in bed.  What it interesting is that in different scenes we see the characters in question from opposing perspectives.  The article at Kubrick/Floyd discusses the use of this convention, which is apparent especially in the age of silent art cinema.  This type of image reversal is all over Kubrick.  I am not sure what it means, exactly, but I think it has something to do with the general theory of mirrors I'll present later.  There are mirrors present in all three scenes, and in each case characters are in direct eye-line with the mirror on the set.  The first of these mirrors is the first we see in the film.  Danny at the wash basin.

- The musical modulation from E major to minor is timed to three "darkening" events.  The first finds Ullman beginning to explain the Grady tragedy of '70 to Jack.  The second comes just as Jack says he can't sleep because he has "...too much to do...".  We know where his plans will take him... right along the same path as earlier caretaker Charles Grady.  This play of APOW relates also to the content of the novel, which blurs Charles into Delbert.  The third follows Wendy as she crosses from the well-lighted Colorado room into the dark passage behind Jack's typing desk.  This final modulation relates as well, I think, to Grady in some way.  Wendy will confront Jack soon after.  Jack, who is now operating under the spectral influence of Delbert Grady.  To this I add a sneaking suspicion that that "Grady" is a reference to the Monolith, the Moon or both of these.  Is Apollo 13 is the Tragedy of '70?  Off by a foot pound per second, per second?

There is a scene in the first "Superman" movie that has some cryptic moon/monolith clues, which includes a cop called "Officer Mooney" or "Moon-e".  "Grady" is a homophone for "Grade e".  I think that the letter "e", particularly in lower case, is somehow a symbol of the Moon and/or Monolith.  I find a small conformation for this in the  "Superman" film with Brandon Routh, which finds him lifting the monolithic "black" island into space to the music of Ligeti, also used in the soundtrack to "2001".

- I have found two fairly direct lyrical connections, both related to Wendy.  Wendy, says she'll "...lock the door..." lined up nicely to the same lyric in APOW.  Later, the "golden dawn" lyric comes close to Wendy riffling the novel pages at Jack's desk.  As I pointed out,  in the Italian version these pages read..."...the sun holds the morning in its mouth...".

There are one or two things I am forgetting here... I need more diligence in my note taking.  I hope that your comments will jar some of it loose.

I will start on "Fearless" now, which is where I think that this thing really starts to break free and fly.

Peace Oot for Now.  

Mark  

Klaus:

I too was in the spell of Pink Eyes this weekend and took it in twice more.  It is an incredible find indeed.  It feels as though an avalanche hit my brain last week.

I've can't get my thoughts down right now, expect a message tomorrow.




Demiurge Overkill
June 28, 2011

Klaus:

I wanted to take a little time to gather my thoughts, because I don't want to fall into the trap of "forcing" it, offering connections in bulk in an attempt to keep up with your insights.  I want to only report what is there.  The key to this work is some sense of objectivity amidst this swirling subjective tsunami of cinema.  Ulitmately, the goal is to cut this mother into enough pieces to reveal the truth, what ever that is.  I am trying to prevent myself from muddying the waters.

To remark one more time, it really is exactly like the commentary of Joyce scholars with Finnegans Wake, which is my cue to jump into the POW notes:

**I appreciate your concern for clarity, but I think your worry is unnecessary.  So far, your comments have been intelligent and restrained, and have helped me to see many things I had heretofore missed out.  For my end, I am never more satisfied than to be proven wrong on a favorite theory--but I will fight for a good idea until it is surely dead.  Indeed, I must be proven wrong in some way before the thrill of new discovery becomes to life.  My attitude toward this material is the product of a 30 year obsession with "2001".  The basis for this obsession is nothing more than the desire to "make sense" of the movie.  I will not settle for a merely self-satisfying result.  Our endeavor is the natural expansion of the same principle.  We differ here from attributed scholars because we do not seek external validation to our findings.  Throw in everything you've got, complete with any scathing critique, and in the spirit of mutual trust, the truth will rise to the top. 

1st Play

-first mention of 1907- tied to McKenna, but Tunguska happened in 1908, not 1907.  McKenna is usually right on with his facts.

**This slight discrepancy does not deter my interest here.  I think McKenna's "theory" is key.  The hotel is built from '07 to '09.  Indian (alien?) attacks are repelled during construction.  Because of the conflation of Bear/Russia and clues from "Dr. Strangelove", the Tunguska event fits in with my theory that the nuclear events of the 1940's had a reverse "ripple in time effect", precipitating anomalies in the past time stream.

-cruel winters, description of the Caretaker:  why do they not hire TWO families to take care of the Overlook, recognizing the isolation? $$$

**There must be "one family" as a model of the "Nuclear" nature of events at The Overlook.   Jacques Lacan talks about the "algebraic" shuffling of human emotions from one person, family or community onto outside groupings, to allow that certain traumatic facts of life are not dragged into daylight.  The Overlook experience is designed to counteract the false influence of "the other" upon the family unit.


-not physically demanding, psychological:  much like the psychedelic experience, or death.

**It is a fun fact that it is Wendy doing all of the maintenance while Jack writes.

-Charles/Delbert: stacked neatly in the West Wing

-"before I turn you over to Bill" coincides with "Golden Dawn"

**This is interesting.  The symbol of "The Golden Dawn" is the is the ascending blue and descending red triangles you describe that take place near the second playing of "Golden Dawn".  What a great clue.  Nice one bro.  In the "Golden Dawn" symbol there is a sun in the center of the image.  I am also interested in this bit of dialogue "...turn you over to Bill...".  Could it be that Ullman and Watson somehow represent the opposing sides of a One Dollar US Bill?  Turning over as US gives SU--Stuart Ullman.

Second Play

Problems with "reception" Wendy goes into the aurifice.  She contacts the US. Misses torrents?

**I like the "torrents" pun.  "Jack Torrents" seems especially profound.  Could Danny be "DNA Torrents"?  There seem to be more than a few computer related puns hidden in Kubrick at large.  This whole issue of contact wit the forestry service seems related to Moon Vehicle to Earth communication.  The tree on the US Forestry Placard is a rocket rising above plumes of exhaust.  There is a similar image of a tree on the wall at Zeigler's house party in EWS.  The rocket appears to be aimed at the Sun.  This is another clue to some thoughts I have about the use of mirrors as related to some lyrics in "Echoes" ("...no one flies around the sun...").  I'll open this vein when I get into "Fearless".

Wendy-yellow top, blue bottom

**Wendy's yellow top times to match the VW from play One of OOTD.

Language on the radio: they say "OVER" to note a stop in communication because they can't LOOK at each other.

Danny: cognitive hallucination of two girls, wearing red, white, blue

Danny-when he talks to Tony, they can't LOOK at each other.  This is back to your theme of listening without looking, with Adults using phones, radio, TV, the Child either: utilizing the organic, original media, or recreating this media based communication through mental disturbance ( imaginary friend).  The key here is content.

-42:  1st play, Danny has 42 on his sweater, looking in mirror:  tv like reflection.  2nd play, Summer of 42 on the TV.
The day is Monday, Moonday.  The woman wants to give the boy $$$ for his service.
He refuses, will take coffee and marvelous doughnuts instead.  There's a fantastic transition between the Summer of 42 dialogue to Danny and Wendy speaking.  The kid in '42 switches roles and asks the woman if he can get his firetruck.  Follow the scene on the TV as if the subtitles are strictly for that.

**Oedipus Wrecks.  I love your notion of interplay between the TV and reality in this scene.  Which one is real?  Who made who?

- books surround the apartment, but very few are seen at the Overlook.
TV is central.

Third Play

Right back where we started from, Daddy away "working", Danny abused, and actually wearing the brown fur of the Teddy bear (robe), watching TV over breakfast with red and white tablecloth.

Halloran asks Wendy if she is a Winnie, and their is a Winnie the Pooh Bear next to the baseball bat.  Wendy is a Winnie, and will protect her honey (she calls Danny "hon").

Promises of time/obligations of time: Five minutes, five months.  Lotsa fives.

The visual of Wendy over the manuscript in the box  reveals a  descending blue and ascending red triangle on the ceiling.

Wendy understands her husband to be the blind creator/demiurge of gnostic theology.  A false god who imprisons.

Re:Water/Waters:  Roger Waters split the image in two and reveals the audio, the radio frequency of Tony, who delivers accurate content.

**Here is a corker!  What if "Tony" is also "Tone e".  Such would fit with your idea of "accurate" (in tune?) audio content.  Many of the songs are in the key of E and/or contain the note "e" as a part of the triad of the key signature.

I want to send some additional commentary on your notes.  I agree "Fearless" is where this elevates.

**Over all, an excellent batch of clues in your discovery.  I look forward to your upcoming commentary.  I am gonna start on "Fearless" now.

For now,

BK


Outside the Wall
June 28, 2011

Klaus:

"Could it be that prior to the age of sound reproduction and synch, that we lived somehow outside of sound, "outside the wall", in a world of silent psychic imagery,with the music of the spheres as audio track?"--LeClair

This made me think of the bicameral brain, and the supposed "wall" between the two.  This union of media might reflect the union we experienced consciously.  This might have had the effect of isolation instead of liberation, where instead of a wall dividing, there is a wall enclosing.

Roger Waters concerts for the Berlin Wall falling down might have been a misguided celebration.

Klaus:

There are 86 metals in the modern periodic table.
Germany is divided into two provinces, Upper Germany and Lower Germany, year 86 AD.

LeClair:

Dear William,

Before I give some thoughts** I want to report another beautiful discovery.  I am off and running the "tensor", measuring three Kubrick's against three separate Floyd's.  I was simply astounded with the first control, found by mashing "2001" with "The Wall".  It is awesome.  I propose the gentleman's wager that if you perform this first experiment, completing the tensor will immediately self validate.  The time code is 00:04:22 on the movie.  All Play Repeat on the albums as always.  The start codes are standard for each film, 4;22 for "2001" and as already practiced for "EWS" and "The Shining".

I plan to carry out the complete tensor as follows for what I hope is maximum tension.

Act One:
2001 vs. The Wall
The Shining vs. DSTOM
EWS vs. Meddle

Act Two:
EWS vs. DSOTM
2001 vs. Meddle
The Shining vs. The Wall

Act Three:
The Shining vs. Meddle
EWS vs. The Wall
2001 vs. DSOTM

**Notes from this email threaded into email above

Klaus:

http://nndmt.com/audio/McKenna/

If you'd like to hear the rest of the lecture that follows the bifurcation rap, go to "Rites of Spring 1-B" in the above link.  This picks up in mid story and continues.  Good stuff.




2001/Wall
June 28, 2011

"Isn't this where we came in?"

Digging it.

How could I never connect the stewardess in pink sitting next to Floyd!!!

LeClair:

Still working on "Fearless" and juggling my so-called "normal life".  Should be a mail later today.  I am glad you did the 2o01/Wall mash.  Pretty nice, huh?  The ending is particularly smashing.

I just want to say that it is really rewarding to find someone out there like yourself, not only for your excellent insight, but for your energy and good humor.  I am grateful to have you to talk with--about these mysteries so scintillating.

Have a good one...

Klaus:

Second turn of the wall through 2001.  Might be my aesthetic favorite.




Felix Culpa
June 30, 2011

Klaus:

My DVD malfunctioned, so that the second track The Thin Ice played for it's second time right at the end of the Intermission.  This played perfectly to my eyes and ears.  Will have to replay with a nonsmudgy DVD to compare.